The Hidden Cost of Underpricing: Why Cheap Work Can Weaken a Good Business
Listen to the audio version of this blog post.
Watch a video summary of this post.
7. The Hidden Cost of Not Feeling Worthy
It would be easy to treat underpricing as a personal confidence problem.
The owner feels uncomfortable charging more, loses a little margin and accepts that as the price of winning the work. Nobody else appears to be affected. But underpricing does not remain inside the owner’s head. It eventually appears in the accounts, the bank balance, the workload and the standard of service customers receive.
“Self-doubt has a commercial cost.”
A business that consistently charges too little may still appear successful. It can have plenty of customers, a full order book and increasing turnover. Everyone may be extremely busy. But activity can disguise a serious weakness: the business is not retaining enough of the value it creates.
That shortage of margin gradually affects almost every part of the organisation.
Revenue is not the same as a worthwhile return
Winning a £100,000 contract can feel like a considerable achievement.
It adds to turnover, fills the order book and keeps the team occupied. But the value of a contract is not determined by the size of the invoice. It is determined by what remains after the work has been delivered.
Suppose a business wins a project for £100,000. It expects the direct costs to be £70,000, leaving £30,000 to contribute towards overheads and profit. During the quotation process, however, the owner reduces the price to £90,000 because they are worried about losing the work.
The project still requires the same people, materials, management and equipment. The direct costs remain £70,000. The owner has reduced the selling price by 10%, but the contribution has fallen from £30,000 to £20,000, a reduction of one-third.
That is the danger of discounting. A relatively modest reduction in price can remove a disproportionately large amount of profit.
If the project then encounters £5,000 of unforeseen costs, the remaining contribution falls to £15,000. What originally appeared to be a healthy contract may now provide very little return once overheads are considered.
The business has completed all the work, carried all the risk and satisfied the customer. Yet much of the reward disappeared before the job began.
Insufficient margin leaves no room for reality
Few jobs proceed exactly as planned.
A supplier may increase a price. A customer may delay a decision. A member of staff may be absent. The work may take longer than expected. An error might need correcting. Margin provides room for these normal commercial uncertainties.
When a job is priced properly, a problem may reduce the profit without threatening the entire contract. When the margin has already been negotiated away, even a small problem can turn the work into a loss.
This does not mean businesses should price carelessly and rely on a large margin to cover inefficiency. Costs still need to be controlled, and mistakes should be addressed.
But a price that only works if everything goes perfectly is not a robust price.
A business needs enough margin to withstand ordinary variation. Otherwise, every delayed delivery, incorrect measurement or additional hour becomes a financial crisis.
Profit problems quickly become cash-flow problems
A business can survive a period of low profit if it has sufficient cash. It cannot survive indefinitely without either. Underpricing places pressure on both.
The business must often pay wages, suppliers and other costs before it receives payment from the customer. If the price barely covers those costs, very little cash is generated to fund the next job. The company becomes dependent on receiving the next deposit or customer payment to meet commitments created by earlier work.
This can create a dangerous cycle:
- Prices are reduced to win more work.
- The work produces inadequate margin.
- The business experiences cash-flow pressure.
- It becomes desperate to win the next job.
- The next price is reduced to secure it quickly.
- The underlying problem becomes worse.
At this point, the owner may believe the company needs more sales. What it may actually need is better sales.
Additional low-margin turnover can increase the strain because growth requires more labour, materials and working capital. The business must finance a greater volume of activity without retaining enough profit from it.
It is possible to grow turnover and run out of cash at the same time.
Low prices are often paid for with the owner’s time
When the price cannot absorb the true cost of delivery, somebody must make up the difference. In a small business, that person is usually the owner.
They complete work in the evenings because there is not enough margin to employ additional help. They deal with customer queries at weekends because the business cannot afford proper support. They manage projects, correct mistakes and complete administrative work themselves.
On paper, the job may still appear profitable because the owner’s additional time has not been fully costed.
In reality, the missing price is being paid through unpaid labour.
This is why some apparently successful owners work 60 or 70 hours a week while earning less than an experienced employee. Their business is not producing an adequate commercial return; it is being subsidised by their evenings, weekends and personal life.
That model can continue for a while, particularly when the owner is ambitious and energetic. It becomes harder to sustain as the business grows.
Eventually, exhaustion affects judgement, relationships and health. What began as a small concession on price turns into a much higher personal cost.
The business cannot recruit the people it needs
Good employees are expensive, and rightly so.
They need competitive salaries, training, equipment, management and a working environment in which they can succeed. They also expect some security that the business will remain capable of paying them.
A company with persistently weak margins may know it needs another experienced manager, technician or administrator but cannot afford to recruit one. The owner then attempts to cover the gap personally, making the workload problem worse.
Alternatively, the business recruits someone cheaper who lacks the necessary experience. That person requires more supervision, completes the work less efficiently or makes mistakes that create additional costs.
The low-price model begins influencing the quality of the team.
This is particularly dangerous when the business promises a premium service. The marketing may describe expertise, responsiveness and personal attention, but the price does not provide enough resources to deliver those promises consistently.
You cannot build a strong team indefinitely on prices designed merely to keep everyone busy.
Customer service begins to deteriorate
Underpricing can initially appear generous to the customer. They receive the service for less money, and the business wins the work. Over time, however, the lack of margin begins affecting delivery.
The business accepts more jobs to generate the income it needs. People become overloaded. Telephone calls take longer to return. Deadlines slip. Important details are missed. Customers receive less attention because the team is rushing from one urgent task to another.
The company may still care deeply about providing a good service. The problem is that it has not charged enough to create the capacity required to provide it.
- Responsiveness needs spare time.
- Quality control needs management attention.
- Good communication needs people who are not permanently overwhelmed.
When every available hour must be sold simply to cover costs, there is no room to deal with unexpected customer needs.
Low prices may help win customers, but they can make those customers harder to serve well.
Investment is continually postponed
A healthy business must invest before it sees the full benefit.
It may need better equipment, improved software, staff training, stronger marketing or more efficient systems. These investments help the company reduce costs, improve quality and create greater value in the future.
A business operating on inadequate margins rarely has that freedom.
Every available pound is needed for immediate commitments. The new system is postponed. The old vehicle is kept for another year. Training is treated as optional. Marketing is reduced whenever cash becomes tight.
The business becomes trapped using the same inefficient methods that contribute to its weak performance.
This creates another damaging cycle:
- Low prices produce weak margins.
- Weak margins prevent investment.
- A lack of investment restricts improvement.
- The business struggles to create a more valuable offer.
- It continues competing through low prices.
Underpricing not only reduces today’s profit. It can prevent the business from becoming better tomorrow.
Generosity can turn into resentment
Many business owners underprice because they want to be fair and helpful. They agree to a modest fee, provide more than promised and make themselves continually available. Initially, this feels like excellent customer service.
But generosity that is neither recognised nor properly funded can eventually become resentment. The owner begins noticing every additional request.
A customer asks for a quick favour, and the owner thinks, “They already get far more than they pay for.”
An email arrives late in the afternoon and feels like an unreasonable demand. A routine question creates frustration because the job has already consumed more time than expected.
The customer may be completely unaware of the problem. From their perspective, they are simply asking for the service the business has always provided.
The resentment arises because the commercial arrangement is unbalanced, but the owner has never corrected it. A properly priced relationship makes genuine generosity easier. The business can occasionally do something extra because the core work produces an adequate return.
When everything is underpriced, every extra request feels like another loss.
Volume becomes the only answer
When the margin on each sale is too small, the obvious response is to sell more.
This is how businesses become dependent on volume.
Suppose a company needs £100,000 of gross profit to cover its overheads. If its average gross margin is 40%, it requires £250,000 of sales. If repeated discounting reduces the margin to 25%, it now needs £400,000 of sales to generate the same £100,000.
That extra £150,000 of turnover must still be delivered.
It requires more quotations, more customer communication, more production, more invoicing and potentially more employees and working capital. The business takes on substantially more activity to stand in exactly the same financial position.
Volume is not inherently bad. Some excellent businesses are deliberately designed around high volumes and low margins.
The problem arises when a small business accidentally adopts that model without the systems, buying power, finance or operational efficiency required to make it work. It charges like a volume operator while delivering a personal, labour-intensive service. The numbers rarely work for long.
The business becomes known as the cheap option
Prices do more than generate revenue. They also influence positioning.
If a business repeatedly wins work by being cheaper, customers begin to associate it with low prices. Referrals arrive with the same expectation:
“I was told you would give me a good deal.”
That may sound positive, but “a good deal” often means “less than everybody else.”
The business gradually attracts more price-sensitive customers. These buyers are less interested in expertise, service or long-term value. They have come because they expect the lowest figure.
This makes future price increases more difficult.
The owner may want to move towards better customers and higher-value work, but the existing reputation continues pulling the business back towards the budget end of the market. Escaping that position can take time. It requires a clearer offer, stronger communication and the willingness to lose some customers who were only loyal to the price.
The longer a business uses cheapness as its main selling point, the harder it becomes to be valued for anything else.
There is no buffer when difficult periods arrive
Every business encounters difficult periods.
A major customer pays late. Demand falls unexpectedly. A project goes wrong. Equipment fails. A key employee leaves. The economy weakens. Businesses with healthy margins can build reserves. Those reserves give management time to respond carefully.
Businesses with inadequate margins often enter the same crisis with nothing available. They are forced to make immediate decisions because there is no financial buffer. They may need to borrow urgently, delay supplier payments, cancel investment or reduce staff. The lack of resilience can turn a manageable problem into a threat to survival.
This is why profit should not be viewed simply as money extracted for the owner’s benefit.
Profit is also protection.
It gives the business the ability to honour its commitments when conditions are less favourable. It allows the company to correct mistakes, retain good people and continue serving customers through difficult periods. A business that never earns enough to build that protection remains permanently vulnerable.
Underpricing transfers risk back to the customer
The customer may believe they have benefited from a low price, but a financially weak supplier creates risk.
What happens if that supplier cannot recruit enough skilled people? What happens if they become too busy to respond? What happens if they lack the cash to buy materials, complete remedial work or remain in business until the project is finished? The customer may experience:
- Missed deadlines.
- Inconsistent quality.
- Poor communication.
- Unexpected additional charges.
- Constant changes of staff.
- Reduced after-sales support.
- Incomplete work.
- The need to find a replacement supplier.
“A price that is unsustainable for the supplier is not necessarily a bargain for the customer.”
This is particularly important in long-term relationships. If a customer wants a reliable supplier that will continue supporting them for years, that supplier must be allowed to earn enough to remain healthy. Customers do not benefit when good businesses price themselves into failure.
A practical example
Consider two maintenance companies.
Both promise to provide routine servicing, emergency support and rapid responses. The first prices the contract at £30,000 a year. The second quotes £40,000.
The first company wins because it is £10,000 cheaper.
However, its price leaves very little margin. To make the contract work, it needs each engineer to manage more customers. Preventative visits are completed as quickly as possible. Training is delayed, and the business keeps older equipment in service because replacements are unaffordable.
When the customer reports a serious problem, every engineer is already committed elsewhere. The promised response time cannot be met. Production is disrupted while the customer waits.
The second company’s higher price allowed it to maintain spare capacity, employ experienced engineers, hold important replacement parts and invest in better diagnostic equipment.
The customer saved £10,000 on the contract but lost considerably more through one avoidable period of downtime.
This does not mean the most expensive supplier is always the best. It means the customer should ask whether the price gives the supplier a realistic opportunity to deliver what has been promised.
Underpricing is not protection
Many owners reduce prices because it feels like the safest choice.
A lower price appears more likely to win the job. Winning the job protects turnover, keeps people busy and reduces the immediate fear of an empty order book.
But the protection is temporary.
If the work does not produce sufficient margin, it weakens cash flow. It increases the workload, prevents investment and leaves the business unable to absorb mistakes. The owner works longer hours while the service becomes increasingly difficult to maintain.
The business wins the work but loses some of its ability to build a sustainable future.
That is the central irony of underpricing:
“The price you reduce to protect the business can gradually become the thing that weakens it.”
Charging properly is therefore not simply about earning more money. It is about creating the conditions required to deliver what you have promised. Adequate margin allows you to employ capable people, invest in better systems, respond when customers need help and remain dependable when circumstances become difficult.
A sustainable price protects the supplier. Just as importantly, it protects the customer.
8. Confidence Does Not Mean Making Up a Bigger Number
There is a great deal of pricing advice telling business owners to “know your worth,” “double your prices” or “charge what you deserve.” I understand the intention behind it. Too many capable businesses do undervalue themselves, and many owners need encouragement to stop apologising for making a profit.
“But confidence is not a pricing strategy.”
You cannot take a service that was £5,000 yesterday, decide that you finally believe in yourself and charge £15,000 tomorrow without establishing why the customer should pay the difference. A higher price does not become justified simply because you have found the courage to state it.
The customer is not responsible for improving your self-esteem. They are not buying your confidence, ambition or personal sense of worth. They are buying a commercial result.
That result might be increased revenue, lower costs, fewer mistakes, reduced risk, improved capacity or greater certainty. Whatever it is, the price must make sense in relation to the value created and the alternatives available.
This is where the phrase “charge your worth” can become unhelpful.
Your worth as a person cannot be expressed on a quotation. A rejected proposal does not reduce it, and an accepted premium price does not increase it. What can be assessed is the commercial value your business creates. That distinction matters:
“Your personal worth is not determined by your price. But the price must properly reflect the commercial value your business creates.”
Confidence must follow evidence
Real pricing confidence does not come from repeating positive statements to yourself before a sales meeting. It comes from being able to explain, calmly and clearly, why the price makes sense. If a customer asks why your service costs £20,000, “because we know our worth” is not a compelling answer. A much stronger answer would explain:
- The problem being solved.
- The outcome the customer wants.
- The work and resources required.
- The specialist expertise involved.
- The risks you will manage.
- The result you reasonably expect to produce.
- The evidence supporting that expectation.
- The support and accountability included.
- Why your approach differs from cheaper alternatives.
This changes confidence from an emotional performance into an evidence-based position. You are no longer trying to sound certain. You have good reasons to be certain.
Understand the problem before deciding what the solution is worth
A confident price begins with a proper understanding of the customer’s problem. The customer may initially describe what they want rather than what they need.
They might ask for a new website, additional staff, a piece of equipment or a monthly report. If you respond immediately with a standard solution and a price, you may never discover the commercial problem behind the request.
A business asking for a new website might be experiencing poor-quality enquiries. Another may be losing sales because its existing site does not work properly on mobile devices. A third may simply feel that the design looks dated.
The requested deliverable is similar, but the problems and potential value are very different. Before pricing substantial work, I would want to understand:
- What is happening now?
- Why is that a problem?
- Who is affected?
- How frequently does it happen?
- What does it currently cost?
- What risks does it create?
- Why does it need to change now?
- What would a successful outcome look like?
- What would happen if the customer did nothing?
Without this discovery, a premium price may be based on little more than hope. With it, both parties can judge whether the proposed investment is commercially sensible.
Establish the value that could be created
A higher price needs to be supported by a better understanding of the result. This does not mean inventing an exaggerated financial return to make the quotation look attractive. It means working with the customer to identify the realistic consequences of solving the problem. For example, a new scheduling system might:
- Reduce administrative time by 30 hours a week.
- Prevent missed appointments.
- allow the business to complete more jobs.
- Improve invoicing speed.
- Reduce overtime.
- Give managers better information.
Each of these improvements may have a financial or operational value.
If the system costs £25,000 but could reasonably generate annual savings and additional capacity worth £75,000, the investment has a credible commercial case. However, if the benefits are vague and the customer cannot identify any meaningful improvement, charging £25,000 becomes much harder to justify.
The purpose of understanding value is not to discover the maximum amount you can extract from the customer. It is to establish whether the proposed exchange is worthwhile for both parties.
Documented results are stronger than promises
Every business claims to deliver quality, service and expertise.
Those words are easy to use because they require no proof. A premium price needs something stronger. Documented results show what the business has achieved in the past. That evidence might include:
- Costs reduced.
- Revenue generated.
- Time saved.
- Delivery times improved.
- Errors prevented.
- Downtime reduced.
- Cash flow released.
- Customer satisfaction improved.
- Projects delivered on schedule.
- Targets achieved.
Suppose a consultant claims their work improves profitability. That sounds positive, but it remains a broad promise.
Compare it with:
“Across the last six projects, we identified annual savings ranging from £40,000 to £125,000. The average client recovered our fee within four months.”
The second statement gives the buyer something concrete to assess. Past performance cannot guarantee a future result, and evidence should never be manipulated to imply that it can. But documented outcomes make the commercial case more credible.
They also strengthen the owner’s internal belief. It is easier to stand behind a price when you can see the results your work has already produced.
Testimonials explain the experience behind the result
Numbers demonstrate what happened. Testimonials can explain what it was like to work with you. A useful testimonial does more than say:
“Excellent service. Highly recommended.”
It describes the customer’s position before the work, the difference your business made and the result afterwards. For example:
“Before the project, we had no reliable view of our cash position beyond the next few weeks. The new reporting process identified a serious shortfall three months in advance, giving us enough time to change the payment schedule and arrange additional finance.”
This testimonial does not merely praise the supplier. It helps a prospect recognise a problem similar to their own. Case studies can go further by showing:
- The customer’s original situation.
- The problem or risk.
- The proposed approach.
- The work completed.
- The obstacles overcome.
- The final result.
- The measurable impact.
A well-written case study makes an invisible service visible. It helps the customer understand what they are buying and why it may be worth more than a superficially similar alternative.
A defined process makes expertise credible
Expertise is difficult for customers to judge in advance. Anyone can say they are experienced or professional. A clearly defined process shows how that expertise will be applied. For instance, a business might explain that every project includes:
- An initial discovery stage.
- Defined objectives and success measures.
- A detailed implementation plan.
- Named responsibility for delivery.
- Regular progress reporting.
- Formal review points.
- Documented control of changes.
- A completion review.
- Agreed follow-up support.
The process gives the customer confidence that the outcome is not dependent on luck or last-minute heroics. It also helps the business deliver consistently.
When important steps are documented, they can be repeated, measured and improved. Employees know what is expected, customers understand what will happen, and fewer details are missed.
This makes the higher price easier to defend because the customer can see the structure supporting it.
Reduce risk in a meaningful way
Sometimes a customer accepts a higher price because the offer feels safer. That safety can be created through guarantees, staged commitments or clearer accountability. But risk reduction must be meaningful. A vague “satisfaction guaranteed” statement offers little reassurance if the customer does not understand what will happen when they are dissatisfied.
A stronger commitment might specify:
- What standard will be achievedخ
- What happens if a deadline is missed.
- Which faults will be corrected without additional charge.
- How quickly problems will be acknowledged.
- Who is responsible for resolving them.
- Whether payment is linked to agreed milestones.
- Which risks remain the customer’s responsibility.
Not every service can or should guarantee a particular commercial result. An accountant cannot guarantee that a business will become more profitable, and a marketing consultant cannot responsibly guarantee a precise number of sales.
But they can often guarantee elements within their control: the process, response time, deliverables, communication and corrective action. A meaningful guarantee demonstrates confidence because the supplier accepts consequences if it fails to deliver what it has promised.
A higher price needs a differentiated offer
Charging more for an indistinguishable service is difficult. If your scope, process and customer experience are effectively identical to those of several competitors, the buyer has little reason to accept a substantial premium.
The answer is not to describe the same offer using more impressive language. It is to create a genuine difference. That difference might include:
- Specialist knowledge of the customer’s industry.
- Faster implementation.
- More comprehensive planning.
- Better reporting.
- Senior-level involvement.
- Stronger project management.
- Improved after-sales support.
- Greater availability.
- A more complete solution.
- Better protection against a recognised risk.
The differentiation must matter to the customer.
An additional feature with no relevance to their problem does not strengthen the value proposition. It simply adds complexity and possibly cost. A premium offer should not contain more for the sake of appearing larger. It should provide more of what the right customer values.
Costing remains non-negotiable
Understanding value does not remove the need to understand cost. A business can create an excellent result for the customer and still lose money delivering it. Before setting the price, you need a realistic assessment of:
- Labour.
- Materials.
- Subcontractors.
- Management and supervision.
- Travel.
- Finance costs.
- Overheads.
- Customer support.
- Contingency.
- Delivery risk.
- The potential cost of remedial work.
- The capacity consumed by the project.
These costs establish the commercial foundation.
If the customer cannot justify a price that covers them and provides an adequate return, the work may not be viable.
“Enthusiasm about an opportunity does not change the economics.”
Accurate costing also prevents false confidence. A price can look impressive while containing very little profit because important costs were overlooked. Turnover is not the reward for doing the work. The reward is what remains after every relevant cost has been paid.
Margin should be deliberate, not accidental
Many businesses discover the margin after the work has been completed. They start with the price they believe the customer will accept, deduct the eventual costs and hope that something worthwhile remains. That is not margin management. It is margin discovery.
A better approach is to decide the required return before submitting the quotation. The target margin should reflect factors such as:
- The normal return required by the business.
- The complexity of the work.
- The degree of uncertainty.
- The amount of capital required.
- The payment terms.
- The risk of delay or rework.
- The opportunity cost of using the available capacity.
- The strategic value of the customer or project.
Different types of work may justify different margins. A repeatable service with predictable delivery may carry less risk than a bespoke project with an uncertain scope.
The important point is that the margin is chosen consciously.
If the final price cannot support it, something must change. The scope may need to be reduced, the delivery method improved, or the opportunity declined. The target margin should not quietly disappear merely because the final number feels uncomfortable.
Confidence includes the ability to say no
The willingness to walk away is one of the strongest foundations for pricing confidence. This does not mean becoming arrogant or refusing to negotiate. It means recognising that not every opportunity is commercially suitable. A piece of work may be wrong for the business because:
- The budget is unrealistic.
- The customer does not value the necessary level of service.
- The risks cannot be priced safely.
- The payment terms are unacceptable.
- The scope remains unclear.
- The required timescale is unreasonable.
- The project would prevent the business from accepting better work.
- The relationship is unlikely to be healthy.
- The required margin cannot be achieved.
Saying no to revenue can be difficult, particularly when the order book is quiet. But accepting unsuitable work does not remove its underlying problems. It brings those problems into the business.
A project with inadequate margin still consumes people, cash and management attention. It may create more pressure than an empty space in the schedule. The ability to decline work protects the business from pricing decisions driven solely by fear.
Build an evidence stack
Rather than trying to manufacture confidence at the moment of presenting a price, I would encourage businesses to build what might be called an “evidence stack.” This brings together the reasons the price is credible:
- Customer evidence: A clear understanding of the problem and desired outcome.
- Value evidence: A realistic assessment of the financial or operational improvement.
- Performance evidence: Documented results from previous work.
- Trust evidence: Testimonials, references and relevant case studies.
- Delivery evidence: A defined and repeatable process.
- Risk evidence: Guarantees, controls and clear accountability.
- Differentiation evidence: Meaningful reasons the offer is not directly comparable with cheaper alternatives.
- Cost evidence: Accurate knowledge of what proper delivery requires.
- Return evidence: A deliberate and commercially appropriate target margin.
- Decision discipline: The willingness to reject work that fails the test.
With this evidence in place, the price stops being an unsupported demand. It becomes the logical conclusion of the commercial case.
Confidence is calm, not theatrical
A confident supplier does not need to dominate the conversation or pretend that price is irrelevant.
They can acknowledge that the customer has alternatives. They can answer difficult questions and explain where the figure comes from. They can discuss scope or payment terms without immediately surrendering margin.
Most importantly, they can admit when their offer is not the right fit.
Confidence sounds like this:
“Based on the problem we have discussed, the outcome you need and the level of support required, this is the solution I recommend. The investment is £25,000.”
It does not sound like this:
“We charge £25,000 because we are premium and know our worth.”
The first statement is built around the customer and the commercial result. The second is built around the supplier’s desired identity. One creates a reason to buy. The other merely makes a claim.
Charge for the case you can prove
The answer to underpricing is not arbitrary overpricing. Both ignore the commercial evidence. Underpricing begins with fear and asks, “What is the lowest figure the customer might accept?” Arbitrary overpricing begins with ego and asks, “What is the highest figure I can persuade them to pay?”
A better pricing question is:
“What price fairly reflects the value created, the cost and risk of delivery, and the return required by the business?”
That price may be considerably higher than you currently charge. If so, you should be able to explain why.
Perhaps your work prevents an expensive problem. Perhaps your process provides greater certainty. Perhaps you have evidence of stronger results or offer a level of responsibility that cheaper competitors do not.
Those are commercial reasons for a higher price.
Confidence matters because you must be willing to present and defend that price. But confidence should be the product of a strong commercial case, not a substitute for one.
Do not make up a bigger number and hope your enthusiasm will carry it.
Build an offer that creates genuine value. Gather the evidence that proves it. Calculate what it costs to deliver properly. Decide the return the business requires. Then state the price with confidence because you understand exactly why it is justified.
9. Build a Price You Can Believe In
If you do not believe in your price, the customer will sense it.
It appears in the way you present the quotation, the speed with which you offer alternatives and your willingness to make concessions. Instead of calmly explaining the commercial case, you begin trying to defend the number before it has even been challenged.
The solution is not to practise sounding more confident. It is to build a price supported by enough commercial evidence that confidence becomes the natural response. A defensible price should answer five questions:
- What will it genuinely cost us to deliver?
- What return does the business need?
- What is the result worth to the customer?
- How can we make the offer more valuable and less risky?
- What proof supports the promises we are making?
Let us work through each of those questions.
Step 1: Know the real cost
Every defensible price begins with an accurate understanding of cost. This sounds straightforward, but many businesses know far less about the true cost of their work than they imagine. They account for the most obvious inputs: direct labour, materials and subcontractors. They then add a percentage and assume the remaining amount represents profit.
The calculation may look precise while excluding a significant proportion of the resources required to deliver the work.
Labour costs more than the hourly wage
If an employee earns £20 per hour, it does not cost the business £20 to provide an hour of their time.
The true employment cost may also include:
- Employer’s National Insurance.
- Pension contributions.
- Holiday pay.
- Sickness and other absence.
- Training.
- Workwear and equipment.
- Vehicles and travel.
- Insurance.
- Supervision.
- Unproductive time.
- Administrative support.
Not every paid hour can be charged to a customer. Employees attend meetings, travel between jobs, complete paperwork, maintain equipment and wait for information. If an employee is paid for 40 hours but only 28 are realistically chargeable, the cost of each productive hour is considerably higher than a simple wage calculation suggests.
Unless those costs are understood, the business can appear to make money on every hour while failing to recover the actual cost of employing the person.
Management time must be included
Management time is one of the most frequently overlooked costs, particularly in owner-managed businesses.
The owner may prepare the quotation, attend planning meetings, coordinate the work, deal with the customer and resolve problems. Because they do not record or charge for this time, it disappears from the project costing.
But it has not disappeared from the business.
If a £50,000 project requires 60 hours of the owner’s attention, those hours represent a genuine cost. They cannot be used to win new work, improve the business or support another customer. The fact that the owner does not pay themselves separately for those hours does not make them free. I would therefore include all the management required before, during and after delivery:
- Surveying and estimating.
- Planning and scheduling.
- Internal meetings.
- Customer communication.
- Supplier coordination.
- Progress reporting.
- Approval and quality control.
- Invoicing and credit control.
- Resolving queries after completion.
This is particularly important on complex work. Two projects with similar direct costs may require very different levels of management.
Recover a fair share of overhead
The business must also pay costs that cannot be allocated neatly to one job. These may include:
- Premises.
- Software.
- Office employees.
- Accountancy and legal fees.
- Marketing.
- Insurance.
- Telephone and internet.
- Vehicles.
- Equipment.
- Compliance.
- General management.
These costs exist whether a particular project is won or lost. The business must recover them across the work it completes. A common mistake is to look at a job and conclude that it is profitable because the selling price exceeds the direct costs. But the difference is not all profit. Some of it must pay for the infrastructure that made the work possible.
A job that contributes something towards overhead may occasionally be worth accepting for a specific reason. It is not a sustainable basis for pricing everything.
Allow for risk and rework
Quotes are prepared before the work is completed. They are therefore based on assumptions. Some projects are predictable. Others contain considerable uncertainty. Risk may arise from:
- An unclear scope.
- Uncertain site conditions.
- Customer-controlled delays.
- Volatile material prices.
- Dependence on third parties.
- Tight deadlines.
- Technically difficult work.
- Unfamiliar requirements.
- The possibility of remedial work.
- Extended warranty obligations.
The greater the uncertainty, the more dangerous it becomes to price the work as though everything will proceed perfectly. Risk should not be covered by adding an arbitrary amount to every quotation. It should be identified and addressed.
That may mean clarifying the scope, changing the contract, agreeing assumptions, including a contingency or charging a higher margin because the business is accepting greater exposure.
A project carrying substantial risk should not be priced like routine work.
Include finance costs
The timing of cash matters.
A project can be profitable on paper while placing enormous pressure on the bank account. If the business must pay wages, materials and subcontractors several months before receiving payment, it is effectively financing part of the customer’s project. That finance has a cost, whether it comes from:
- An overdraft.
- A loan.
- Invoice finance.
- The owner’s money.
- Cash that could have been used elsewhere.
Payment terms should therefore form part of the price.
A customer paying a deposit and settling promptly does not create the same financial burden as one requiring the supplier to fund a large project for 60 or 90 days. The price, deposit and payment schedule should reflect that difference.
Include the cost of supporting the customer
The work may continue after the visible deliverable has been provided. Customers ask questions, request help and need problems resolved. Products may carry warranties. Professional services may include follow-up meetings or ongoing access to advice.
These commitments consume real resources.
If support is part of the offer, its likely cost should be estimated and included. If the level of support is unlimited or poorly defined, the business may accept an obligation it cannot sensibly price. Clear boundaries benefit both parties. The customer understands what help is available, and the business can ensure the price supports it.
Step 2: Decide the required return
Once the real cost is understood, the next question is not: “What do we think we can get away with charging?”
It is: “What return must this work produce to justify using our capacity and accepting the risk?”
The required margin should be decided before the quotation is presented. Otherwise, margin becomes whatever remains after the customer has negotiated, costs have increased, and the project has been completed.
That is not a target. It is an accident.
Mark-up and margin are not the same
This distinction causes expensive mistakes.
Suppose a job costs £80,000.
If the business adds a 25% mark-up, the selling price becomes £100,000. The profit is £20,000.
But £20,000 is only 20% of the £100,000 selling price. The business has achieved a 20% margin, not 25%.
To achieve a 25% margin on an £80,000 cost, the required selling price is:
£80,000 ÷ 75% = £106,667
The difference is £6,667.
On one project, that is significant. Across a year’s work, repeatedly confusing mark-up with margin can remove a substantial proportion of the expected profit.
Set a minimum, not merely an ambition
A business may have a target margin of 30%, but unless there is also a minimum acceptable margin, the target will often be sacrificed under pressure. The minimum should represent the point below which the work is no longer commercially attractive.
It may vary according to the nature of the work. A predictable repeat service with payment in advance might justify a different margin from a bespoke project with uncertain costs and extended payment terms. The decision should consider:
- Delivery risk.
- Demand for the available capacity.
- Length of commitment.
- Capital required.
- Payment terms.
- Probability of rework.
- Customer behaviour.
- Strategic value.
- Alternative opportunities.
If a price falls below the minimum, somebody with appropriate authority should be required to approve it and document the reason. That requirement creates a valuable pause. It stops an emotional discount from quietly becoming a commercial decision.
Work backwards from the required result
Imagine the full expected cost of a project is £72,000 and the business requires a 25% margin.
The price is not £72,000 plus 25%. It is:
£72,000 ÷ 75% = £96,000
That £96,000 becomes the minimum price required to achieve the target margin, assuming the cost estimate is accurate.
If market evidence suggests the customer will only pay £80,000, the answer is not to ignore the calculation and hope for the best. The business has choices:
- Reduce the cost of delivery.
- Change the scope.
- Redesign the offer.
- Adjust the responsibilities.
- Improve the payment terms.
- Find a customer who values the result more highly.
- Decline the work.
What it should not do is accept £80,000 while continuing to deliver a £96,000 solution.
Step 3: Understand the customer’s value
Cost establishes what the business needs. Value helps determine whether the customer has a reason to pay it. I would not attempt to turn every customer benefit into a precise financial calculation. Some outcomes are difficult to quantify, and pretending otherwise can damage credibility. But I would always try to understand the scale and importance of the problem. Ask what the work will help the customer:
- Gain.
- Save.
- Avoid.
- Protect.
- Improve.
Gain: Will the solution help the customer generate additional revenue, increase capacity, win a contract or reach a new market? A new production system, for example, might allow the business to complete 20% more work without increasing headcount.
Save: Will it reduce labour, waste, energy, administration or another recurring cost? A £30,000 system that saves £4,000 each month may be easier to justify than a £10,000 system producing no measurable saving.
Avoid: Will the work prevent penalties, errors, downtime, customer losses or expensive remedial action? The value of prevention may not appear as additional income, but avoiding a significant cost can be just as valuable.
Protect: Will it protect an important customer, contract, asset, reputation or source of income? A business may invest because the consequence of failure is unacceptable, even if the improvement does not produce immediate additional revenue.
Improve: Will the result make the organisation faster, more reliable, easier to manage or better able to make decisions? These improvements may create value across several areas rather than producing one easily measured return.
The purpose of these questions is not to find the highest theoretical value and use it to justify an excessive price. It is to establish whether the customer’s potential benefit is sufficiently large to support the required investment.
If the business needs to charge £96,000 but the customer is likely to gain only £50,000, the offer does not make sense in its current form. If the work could help the customer gain or protect £500,000, the £96,000 price may be entirely reasonable.
Step 4: Strengthen the offer
If the customer cannot see enough value to support the required price, cutting the price is only one possible response, and often the least imaginative. A better response is to strengthen the offer. The core deliverable may remain the same, but the complete customer proposition can be improved in several ways.
Improve the result
Can the work produce a more complete or commercially useful outcome? An accountant could move beyond producing management accounts and include interpretation, recommended actions and follow-up.
A software developer could include training and implementation support rather than simply handing over the finished system. The objective is not to add unnecessary extras. It is to help the customer gain more value from what they are already buying.
Improve the experience
The experience of buying and receiving a service matters. Could you make the process easier through:
- A clearer onboarding process.
- Fewer information requests.
- A named contact.
- Better documentation.
- Simpler approvals.
- More convenient communication.
- A single point of responsibility.
Convenience can be highly valuable to customers whose time is already stretched.
Increase certainty
Can you make the result or timescale more predictable? This could include:
- A detailed delivery plan.
- Clear milestones.
- Defined responsibilities.
- Regular progress reports.
- Formal review points.
- A documented process for managing changes.
- Better quality control.
Greater certainty can justify a higher price because it enables the customer to make other decisions with more confidence.
Improve communication
Many customer problems are not caused by the work itself. They are caused by uncertainty about what is happening. A supplier who provides regular, useful updates can create a substantially better experience without changing the technical deliverable. Good communication should answer:
- What has been completed?
- What happens next?
- Is the work on schedule?
- Are there any risks or decisions required?
- Has the expected cost changed?
- Who is responsible for the next action?
Communication is not merely a courtesy. On important projects, it is part of risk management.
Reduce the customer’s exposure
Can responsibility be transferred from the customer to the supplier?
For example, a contractor might take responsibility for coordinating several trades rather than leaving the customer to manage them individually. An adviser might monitor agreed measures and raise issues proactively instead of waiting for the customer to recognise the problem.
This can make the offer much more valuable because the customer is not simply buying work. They are removing a responsibility from their own organisation. The strongest offers often combine the technical solution with the management required to make that solution successful.
Step 5: Gather proof
A good offer explains what will happen. Proof gives the customer a reason to believe it. Without proof, the customer must rely largely on your confidence and promises. That increases their risk and makes the price harder to defend. Proof can come from several sources.
Results
Show what previous work achieved. This might include:
- Financial savings.
- Revenue growth.
- Reduced delays.
- Improved margins.
- Faster completion.
- Lower error rates.
- Better customer retention.
- Reduced management time.
Use relevant, verifiable examples. A result from a customer in a similar situation is usually more persuasive than a broad claim about the business.
Testimonials
Ask customers to describe the problem you solved and the difference your work made. “Great service” is pleasant but weak. A testimonial explaining that your planning prevented a costly delay gives the prospect something meaningful to consider.
Case studies
A useful case study should explain:
- The original problem.
- Why it mattered.
- The solution provided.
- How the work was managed.
- Any difficulties overcome.
- The final outcome.
- The commercial effect.
This allows the prospect to see how your process works in practice.
Examples
Show customers what they will receive. A sample report, project plan, dashboard or communication schedule can make an intangible service easier to understand. The more visible the offer becomes, the easier it is for the customer to compare it properly.
Accreditations and external validation
Qualifications, accreditations, awards and professional memberships can provide reassurance where they are relevant to the decision. They should support the commercial case rather than replace it. An accreditation may show that a minimum standard has been met, but it does not automatically demonstrate that your business will deliver the best outcome.
Clearly explained processes
Your process is also evidence. A customer may not yet have experienced the result, but a structured and transparent approach demonstrates that delivery has been considered carefully. It shows that the promise is supported by a method.
Bring the five steps together
Imagine a business considering a complex project. It establishes that the full cost of proper delivery is £72,000. This includes labour, management, overhead, finance, risk and follow-up support.
It requires a 25% margin, producing a price of £96,000.
Through its discussions with the customer, it learns that the problem is causing delays, management disruption and lost capacity worth approximately £250,000 a year. The business strengthens the offer by adding detailed project planning, a named project manager, weekly reporting and a clear process for controlling changes.
It then supports the proposition with case studies showing similar projects delivered successfully, testimonials from comparable customers and examples of the reporting the customer will receive. The £96,000 price is no longer an isolated number.
It is supported by:
- A true delivery cost of £72,000.
- A deliberate return for the supplier.
- A problem worth significantly more to the customer.
- An offer designed to improve certainty and reduce risk.
- Evidence that the business can deliver what it promises.
That is a price the owner can believe in because it is neither apologetic nor arbitrary. It works commercially for the supplier and makes economic sense for the customer.
Replace courage with clarity
Pricing will probably never become completely comfortable. Significant quotations carry consequences, and no amount of preparation can guarantee that a customer will say yes. But discomfort becomes much easier to manage when the price has been built properly.
- You know the true cost.
- You know the minimum return required.
- You understand what the result means to the customer.
- You have strengthened the offer around the things they value.
- You have proof supporting the promises.
At that point, standing behind the price requires less courage because you have greater clarity. You are no longer hoping the customer accepts a number you selected. You are presenting a commercial proposition you can explain, evidence and defend.